(no subject)
Nov. 27th, 2009 | 05:01 am
Thanksgiving was last month here in Canada, and in the U.S. it is now over, which puts us all on what I may forgivably call an even footing. Reading the Thanksgiving posts of some of my American friends has put me in mind of some things, which I shall say something about, drawing first a merciful veil for the uninterested or easily bored:
( Read more... )
( Read more... )
Link | Leave a comment {8} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Quothanother
Nov. 5th, 2009 | 12:11 am
Occasionally, silence is not golden but just plain yellow.—David F. Maas
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Quotha: The arithmetic of modern art
Nov. 4th, 2009 | 10:05 pm
This is the age of appeasement, of subordination. The artist is no longer the font; he is the shallow pool. Not the oracle, but the sump. The collection point of a thousand polluted expectations. The political tool of the untalented. The residue of education. The handmaiden of the self-appointed in social criticism.
For the critics have dished it out over the last hundred years, vilifying all, dismissing everyone and everything that could not be “pinned and wriggling on the wall.”
And the artist was silent.
Under the Usurper's rule, modern art has become like Lewis Carroll’s four branches of arithmetic: “ambition, distraction, uglification and derision.”
And the artist was silent.
. . . . . . . . . .
Oh Fathers and Teachers, I claim that analysis is not art. Philosophy is not art. Politics is not art. Destruction is not art. Framing is not art. Finding is not art. Thinking is not art. Randomness is not art. Pathology is not art. Everything that a fool does easily is not art.
Fathers and Teachers, I claim that art is rare. Art requires talent. Art requires isolation. Art requires depth. Art requires subtlety. Art requires mystery. Art requires emotion. Art requires inspiration. The artist tells you what he must do, not what you must do.
Fathers and Teachers, I maintain that all art stands upon two legs: craftsmanship and character. Technique is not art. Emotion is not art. Together they may be art. Or not.
Link | Leave a comment {4} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Coach or dictator?
Oct. 25th, 2009 | 04:31 pm
A rather cute quiz, courtesy of Damian Penny:
And as I said to Mr. Penny, the only thing I know about American football is that Canadian football has bigger balls. (Yes, that’s an intentional double entendre, and no, it isn’t mine. It was actually the CFL’s advertising slogan one year — ‘We have bigger balls.’)
Anyway, such a quiz makes one wonder about that alternate universe in which Hitler was a legendary football coach, and Vince Lombardi conquered Europe.
And as I said to Mr. Penny, the only thing I know about American football is that Canadian football has bigger balls. (Yes, that’s an intentional double entendre, and no, it isn’t mine. It was actually the CFL’s advertising slogan one year — ‘We have bigger balls.’)
Anyway, such a quiz makes one wonder about that alternate universe in which Hitler was a legendary football coach, and Vince Lombardi conquered Europe.
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Analysis vs. Composition: a text
Oct. 23rd, 2009 | 01:39 pm
I shall, if my wits are spared sufficiently both to remember to do it, and actually to do it, presently be writing a squib of long gestation on the difference between Analysis and Composition. Nearly half of what I want to say has been said already, and therefore better, by Mr. G. K. Chesterton, and in order to save myself the trouble of re-saying it badly, I should therefore like to quote it here for future reference.
This comes from Chesterton’s essay ‘On Mr. Thomas Gray’, in his collection All I Survey:
A NEWSPAPER appeared with the news, which it seemed to regard as exciting and even alarming news, that Gray did not write the ‘Elegy in a Country Churchyard’ in the churchyard of Stoke Poges, but in some other country churchyard of the same sort in the same country. What effect the news will have on the particular type of American tourist who has chipped pieces off trees and tombstones, when he finds that the chips come from the wrong trees, or the wrong tombstones, I do not feel impelled to inquire. Nor, indeed, do I know whether the new theory is proved or not.
Nor do I care whether the new theory is proved or not. What is most certainly proved, if it needed any proving, is the complete lack of imagination, in many journalists and archæologists, about how any poet writes any poem.
( Read more... )
This comes from Chesterton’s essay ‘On Mr. Thomas Gray’, in his collection All I Survey:
A NEWSPAPER appeared with the news, which it seemed to regard as exciting and even alarming news, that Gray did not write the ‘Elegy in a Country Churchyard’ in the churchyard of Stoke Poges, but in some other country churchyard of the same sort in the same country. What effect the news will have on the particular type of American tourist who has chipped pieces off trees and tombstones, when he finds that the chips come from the wrong trees, or the wrong tombstones, I do not feel impelled to inquire. Nor, indeed, do I know whether the new theory is proved or not.
Nor do I care whether the new theory is proved or not. What is most certainly proved, if it needed any proving, is the complete lack of imagination, in many journalists and archæologists, about how any poet writes any poem.
( Read more... )
Link | Leave a comment {4} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Quoth G.K.C.
Oct. 20th, 2009 | 09:28 am
But people must have conversation, they must have houses, and they must have stories. The simple need for some kind of ideal world in which fictitious persons play an unhampered part is infinitely deeper and older than the rules of good art, and much more important. Every one of us in childhood has constructed such an invisible dramatis personae, but it never occurred to our nurses to correct the composition by careful comparison with Balzac. In the East the professional story-teller goes from village to village with a small carpet; and I wish sincerely that any one had the moral courage to spread that carpet and sit on it in Ludgate Circus. But it is not probable that all the tales of the carpet-bearer are little gems of original artistic workmanship. Literature and fiction are two entirely different things. Literature is a luxury; fiction is a necessity. A work of art can hardly be too short, for its climax is its merit. A story can never be too long, for its conclusion is merely to be deplored, like the last halfpenny or the last pipelight. And so, while the increase of the artistic conscience tends in more ambitious works to brevity and impressionism, voluminous industry still marks the producer of the true romantic trash. There was no end to the ballads of Robin Hood; there is no end to the volumes about Dick Deadshot and the Avenging Nine. These two heroes are deliberately conceived as immortal.
—G.K. Chesterton, ‘A Defence Of Penny Dreadfuls’
Link | Leave a comment {3} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Things you didn’t know about me
Oct. 18th, 2009 | 06:04 am
Hat tip to
theswordmaiden for the following:
As an infant, superversive's parents gave him a toy hammer. He gave the world Stonehenge.
Somehow that seems almost appropriate.
Generated by Funny Facts.
EDIT: They know me too well:
superversive doesn't have blood. He is filled with magma.
*glyph of abashment*
FURTHER EDIT:
superversive's credit cards have no limit. Last weekend he maxed them out.
I see they know about my finances as well.
As an infant, superversive's parents gave him a toy hammer. He gave the world Stonehenge.
Somehow that seems almost appropriate.
Generated by Funny Facts.
EDIT: They know me too well:
superversive doesn't have blood. He is filled with magma.
*glyph of abashment*
FURTHER EDIT:
superversive's credit cards have no limit. Last weekend he maxed them out.
I see they know about my finances as well.
Link | Leave a comment {3} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Happy birthday,
kriz1818!
Oct. 5th, 2009 | 12:55 pm
And as I may have said before, congratulations on your excellent taste in birthdays.
In other news, ‘Love Me Do’ is 47 today, and the Beatles are still charting with records from the sixties.
In other news, ‘Love Me Do’ is 47 today, and the Beatles are still charting with records from the sixties.
Link | Leave a comment {2} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Two cheers for alternative medicine!
Aug. 21st, 2009 | 10:11 pm
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
The rules of attraction
Jul. 12th, 2009 | 07:38 am
. . . as I have been given to understand them. This is not a complete list, but will do to not go on with:
1. If you’re attracted to someone too old for you, that’s just gross.
2. If you’re attracted to someone too young for you, that’s gross and obscene.
3. If you’re attracted to someone you think isn’t too old or young for you, but they think you’re too young or old for them, that’s gross, obscene, and clueless.
4. If you’re attracted to someone who doesn’t find you attractive, that’s gross, clueless, and rude.
5. If you’re attracted to someone who is dating someone else, that’s gross, clueless, rude, and offensive.
6. If you’re attracted to someone who is single by choice, that’s gross, clueless, rude, offensive, and an invasion of privacy.
7. If you’re attracted to a coworker, that’s gross, rude, offensive, unprofessional, and illegal.
8. If you’re attracted to a customer, that’s gross, clueless, and unprofessional.
9. If you’re attracted to someone whose customer you are, that’s gross, clueless, rude, offensive, and tacky.
10. If you’re attracted to someone you’ve previously made friends with, that’s gross, obscene, offensive, and gormless.
11. If you’re attracted to someone you haven’t yet made friends with, that’s gross, obscene, clueless, rude, and tacky.
12. If you’re attracted to a complete stranger met in a public place, that’s gross, obscene, rude, and creepy.
13. If you’re attracted to someone more attractive than you, that’s gross, obscene, rude, creepy, and offensive.
14. If you’re attracted to someone less attractive than you, that’s gross, obscene, creepy, tacky, and gormless.
15. If you’re attracted to someone you think is just about as attractive as you, but who thinks you’re less attractive than they are, that’s gross, obscene, rude, creepy, offensive, clueless, and gormless.
16. If you’re attracted to someone you think is just about as attractive as you, but who thinks you’re more attractive than they are, that’s gross, obscene, creepy, tacky, clueless, and gormless.
17. If you’re attracted to someone who is already attracted to someone else, that’s gross, clueless, rude, creepy, possibly obscene, and an invasion of privacy.
18. If you’re attracted to someone richer than you, that’s gross, obscene, creepy, tacky, rude, and mercenary.
19. If you’re attracted to someone poorer than you, that’s gross, obscene, creepy, tacky, rude, offensive, and exploitive.
And now, the big one:
20. If you’re attracted to someone in any of the above categories and you show it, either
(a) by direct statement,
(b) by body language,
(c) by implication,
(d) in public,
(e) in private,
(f) in a semi-public environment,
(g) online,
(h) offline,
(i) in speech,
(j) in writing,
(k) in a bar,
(l) in a car,
(m) on a train,
(n) on a plane,
(o) in a box,
(p) with a fox,
(q) on your blog,
(r) in the fog,
(s) on the phone,
(t) on your own,
(u) to a friend,
(v) in the end,
(w) at the start,
(x) in your heart,
(y) with green eggs and ham, or
(z) to Sam-I-Am,
that is gross, obscene, clueless, gormless, rude, creepy, tacky, offensive, mercenary, exploitive, unprofessional, a gross invasion of privacy, and probably ought to be illegal, and furthermore betrays a total lack of couth, cool, sensitivity, and/or social skills.
So tell me:
Why isn’t the human race extinct yet?
1. If you’re attracted to someone too old for you, that’s just gross.
2. If you’re attracted to someone too young for you, that’s gross and obscene.
3. If you’re attracted to someone you think isn’t too old or young for you, but they think you’re too young or old for them, that’s gross, obscene, and clueless.
4. If you’re attracted to someone who doesn’t find you attractive, that’s gross, clueless, and rude.
5. If you’re attracted to someone who is dating someone else, that’s gross, clueless, rude, and offensive.
6. If you’re attracted to someone who is single by choice, that’s gross, clueless, rude, offensive, and an invasion of privacy.
7. If you’re attracted to a coworker, that’s gross, rude, offensive, unprofessional, and illegal.
8. If you’re attracted to a customer, that’s gross, clueless, and unprofessional.
9. If you’re attracted to someone whose customer you are, that’s gross, clueless, rude, offensive, and tacky.
10. If you’re attracted to someone you’ve previously made friends with, that’s gross, obscene, offensive, and gormless.
11. If you’re attracted to someone you haven’t yet made friends with, that’s gross, obscene, clueless, rude, and tacky.
12. If you’re attracted to a complete stranger met in a public place, that’s gross, obscene, rude, and creepy.
13. If you’re attracted to someone more attractive than you, that’s gross, obscene, rude, creepy, and offensive.
14. If you’re attracted to someone less attractive than you, that’s gross, obscene, creepy, tacky, and gormless.
15. If you’re attracted to someone you think is just about as attractive as you, but who thinks you’re less attractive than they are, that’s gross, obscene, rude, creepy, offensive, clueless, and gormless.
16. If you’re attracted to someone you think is just about as attractive as you, but who thinks you’re more attractive than they are, that’s gross, obscene, creepy, tacky, clueless, and gormless.
17. If you’re attracted to someone who is already attracted to someone else, that’s gross, clueless, rude, creepy, possibly obscene, and an invasion of privacy.
18. If you’re attracted to someone richer than you, that’s gross, obscene, creepy, tacky, rude, and mercenary.
19. If you’re attracted to someone poorer than you, that’s gross, obscene, creepy, tacky, rude, offensive, and exploitive.
And now, the big one:
20. If you’re attracted to someone in any of the above categories and you show it, either
(a) by direct statement,
(b) by body language,
(c) by implication,
(d) in public,
(e) in private,
(f) in a semi-public environment,
(g) online,
(h) offline,
(i) in speech,
(j) in writing,
(k) in a bar,
(l) in a car,
(m) on a train,
(n) on a plane,
(o) in a box,
(p) with a fox,
(q) on your blog,
(r) in the fog,
(s) on the phone,
(t) on your own,
(u) to a friend,
(v) in the end,
(w) at the start,
(x) in your heart,
(y) with green eggs and ham, or
(z) to Sam-I-Am,
that is gross, obscene, clueless, gormless, rude, creepy, tacky, offensive, mercenary, exploitive, unprofessional, a gross invasion of privacy, and probably ought to be illegal, and furthermore betrays a total lack of couth, cool, sensitivity, and/or social skills.
So tell me:
Why isn’t the human race extinct yet?
Link | Leave a comment {29} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
In other news . . .
Jul. 8th, 2009 | 11:24 pm
Saw my GP today; I am now officially recovered from what may or may not have been the currently fashionable strain of H1N1, but was definitely a rather bad flu.
For the last two weeks I have seldom stirred out of bed except for meals, reading-matter, or to visit the toilet and cough up chartreuse slime. Was completely unable to concentrate sufficiently for any serious work. The brand new drawing table I bought more than two weeks ago (for some jobs of cartography that have been left undone far too long) is still sitting unused. I hope to remedy all that very soon.
For the last two weeks I have seldom stirred out of bed except for meals, reading-matter, or to visit the toilet and cough up chartreuse slime. Was completely unable to concentrate sufficiently for any serious work. The brand new drawing table I bought more than two weeks ago (for some jobs of cartography that have been left undone far too long) is still sitting unused. I hope to remedy all that very soon.
Link | Leave a comment {4} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
‘We Didn’t Start the Flame War’
Jul. 8th, 2009 | 11:19 pm
I also quite liked this one. (Don’t complain if you’ve seen it before. I’m posting it by way of making a bookmark for myself, so there.)
Language warning, may be NSFW:
For my money, this is a parody of that rare kind that not only excels but actually justifies the existence of the original song. Billy Joel, you have been redeemed. *wry grin*
Link | Leave a comment {2} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
A very happy birthday to
sartorias
May. 28th, 2009 | 01:07 pm
With many thanks for your friendship and support through all these years.
God bless, be well, and many more!
God bless, be well, and many more!
Link | Leave a comment {3} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Happy birthday,
norilana!
May. 25th, 2009 | 07:32 am
And many more, for you and Norilana Books.
(In honour of the day, I shall get another chunk of the Eye of the Maker outline to you. A catchy blurb paragraph, however, remains beyond my skill at the moment.)
(In honour of the day, I shall get another chunk of the Eye of the Maker outline to you. A catchy blurb paragraph, however, remains beyond my skill at the moment.)
Link | Leave a comment {2} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
P.J. O’Wowser
Apr. 22nd, 2009 | 01:14 am
With a hat tip to
jonathanmoeller, an excerpt from the most wonderfully over-the-top wigging I have yet read:
I liked ‘pointy-headed wowsers’ particularly.
P.J. O’Rourke is a genius. Don’t cross him, or he’ll barbed-quill you to death.
The pharisaical, malefic, and incogitant Guidelines for Bias-Free Writing is a product of the pointy-headed wowsers at the Association of American University Presses who established a Task Force on Bias-Free Language filled with cranks, pokenoses, blowhards, four-flushers, and pettifogs. This foolish and contemptible product of years wasted in mining the shafts of indignation has been published by the cow-besieged, basketball-sotted sleep-away camp for hick bourgeois offspring, Indiana University, under the aegis of its University Press, a traditional dumping ground for academic deadwood so bereft of talent, intelligence, and endeavor as to be useless even in the dull precincts of midwestern state college classrooms.
But perhaps I’m biased.
I liked ‘pointy-headed wowsers’ particularly.
P.J. O’Rourke is a genius. Don’t cross him, or he’ll barbed-quill you to death.
Link | Leave a comment {9} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Happy birthday,
dsgood!
Feb. 20th, 2009 | 07:52 pm
And greetings to all in Baja Manitoba!
Link | Leave a comment {2} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Shirley, you can’t be serious!
Feb. 2nd, 2009 | 09:18 pm
Link | Leave a comment {1} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
What ho, 2009!
Jan. 8th, 2009 | 05:08 pm
Just dropping by to let you all know I’m still alive, reasonably well, and as much in possession of my faculties as usual (for whatever that may be worth). Have been taking care of personal affairs — family business, ‘matters of the heart’, what not. I hope to be making some serious posts soon.
Meanwhile, here’s an excellent short squib on literary (and art, music, and film) critics, a letter from C.S. Lewis to Dorothy L. Sayers:
I think Lewis has nailed something important here — Rem acu tetigit. Any thoughts?
Meanwhile, here’s an excellent short squib on literary (and art, music, and film) critics, a letter from C.S. Lewis to Dorothy L. Sayers:
Magdalen College,
Oxford.
May 29th. 1945
Dear Miss Sayers
The reason why they don’t like either the narrative element or low comedy is that these have obvious immediate entertainment value. These prigs, starting from the true proposition that great art is more than entertainment reach the glaring non sequitur ‘entertainment has no place in great art’ — like people who think music can’t be ‘classical’ if there is a catchy tune in it. It is as if, having learned that religious emotion is not the whole spiritual life and erotic pleasure not the whole of marriage, they then concluded that dryness and impotence were essentials. Pack of muddle headed manichaeans who got marks at their prep. school for reading ‘good’ books wh. they didn’t enjoy. Pah!,
Yours
C. S. Lewis
I think Lewis has nailed something important here — Rem acu tetigit. Any thoughts?
Link | Leave a comment {13} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Happy birthday,
sarah_dimento!
Nov. 6th, 2008 | 03:31 am
With congratulations on the new condo, and thanks for a decade of loyal friendship and good company.

